RELIABILITY UPDATE FOR SN100C
This report is the first of a five part series highlighting
the results of recent reliability testing comparing the Nihon
Superior SN100C nickel stabilized tin/copper alloy to tin/lead
and SAC alloys. The full report is available by contacting
Jim Wertin at jwertin@fctassembly.com.
One of the primary concerns in the industry today is whether
converting to a lead free process from tin/lead will have an
impact on the reliability of the assembly. Much testing has
been performed in the last 10 years on lead free joints in
anticipation of the potential switch by the industry but there
are still concerns about the applicability of the results.
Most of the testing has been to procedures developed over time
for tin/lead alloys and the issue is whether there will be
the same correlation between test results and actual product
life cycle of lead free products in the field. As reliability
is a complex issue, and not just thermal cycling, a number
of tests were performed to attempt to simulate the environment
in use.
The testing included vibration, thermal shock, HALT testing,
salt fog, temperature/humidity, thermal cycling at multiple
ranges, hand solder repair with mixed alloys and thermal cycling.
Vibration and thermal shock results will be discussed in this
report. There were two vibration studies performed with SN100C,
one as part of the Joint Group for Pollution Prevention (JG-PP)
lead free project on SN100C wave solder through-hole parts
and one conducted by the American Competitive Institute (ACI)
on surface mount components soldered with SN100C reflowed solder
paste.
The Joint Group for Pollution Prevention (JG-PP) is a government
supported consortia that has developed a project to build a
class 3 electronic assembly with various lead free alloys to
compare their performance in high reliability testing to the
63/37 tin/lead currently used for military and aerospace applications.
The alloys chosen are listed in Table 1 below and were based
on the lead free alloys either being used in mass production
or being considered by industry experts.
|
BOARD TYPE |
REFLOW ALLOY |
WAVE ALLOY |
|
CONTROL |
Sn63/Pb37 |
Sn63/Pb37 |
|
SnAgCu |
Sn/3.9Ag/.6Cu |
Sn/3.9Ag/.6Cu |
|
SnAgCuBi |
Sn/3.4Ag/1.0Cu/3.3Bi |
Sn/.7Cu/Ni
(SN100C) |
Table 1
In addition to manufacturing the boards with lead free alloys,
the project also tested parts that originally were soldered
with tin/lead and then removed and replaced with a lead free
alloy. This simulates an assembly returned from the field that
would be repaired with the lead free alloy.
The components utilized in the projected included chip components,
CLCC's, PLCC's, CABGA's, PDIP's, TQFP's, TSOP's, BGA's, and
Hybrids. The wave solder testing was performed on PDIP's as
an example of typical through-hole component technology used
in the industry as highlighted in the table below.

The vibration testing was performed by Boeing, Phantom Works
and the results indicate that the SN100C not only outperformed
the SAC alloy but also Sn63Pb37. The table below details the
rating for the vibration results. Vibration testing simulates
the stresses a joint encounters during assembly and use, such
as board bending during depaneling and attachment.

The theory for the improved performance for SN100C is the
greater elongation percentage during tensile testing. Although
SN100C has lower gross tensile strength than both SAC and 63/37
alloys, the elongation percentage is better as detailed in
Table 2. This allows the joint to stretch without breaking
for joints requiring the solder alloy to take the stress, such
as through-hole joints, surface mounted chip resisters and
capacitors, BGA’s, and leadless components.
|
ALLOY |
TENSILE
STRENGTH (M·Pa)
(10mm/min. @25C) |
ELONGATION
(%)
(10mm/min.
@25C) |
ELONGATION
PERCENT DIFFERENCE FROM SN100C |
|
Sn63 |
44 |
25 |
-92 |
|
SAC |
52 |
27 |
-77 |
|
SN100C |
32 |
48 |
0 |
Table 2
Insert table 11- both
With the positive results in vibration testing of SN100C through-hole
joints, a test was performed on reflow joints manufactured
with SN100C solder paste. The testing by the American Competitiveness
Institute (ACI) compared SN100C boards with Sn63Pb37 control
boards. The board is shown below.
Test Conditions
| Sample Conditioning |
100ºC for 300 hours |
| Vibration Modes: |
Resonance survey single sinusoidal
sweep, Random vibration |
| Frequency range |
10 to 2000 H |
| Duration |
7.5 minutes |

Results:
- All vibration samples passed continuity testing. None of
the vibration samples exhibited an increase in resistance
greater than 500 mOhms.
- No visible cracks or separations were detected on the solder
joint exteriors (Figure 3) after testing.
Table 2. Maximum resistance change during vibration testing
(mΩ).
| |
Board |
|
Channel |
001 |
002 |
003 |
004 |
005 |
006 |
007 |
008 |
101 |
102 |
|
QFP 80 |
9.77 |
10.69 |
10.69 |
8.98 |
48.05 |
8.45 |
4.89 |
8.98 |
8.45 |
9.11 |
|
DIP 16 |
12.67 |
6.21 |
6.21 |
6.73 |
79.34 |
5.68 |
10.17 |
5.15 |
5.68 |
5.81 |
|
DIP 16 |
6.34 |
6.07 |
6.07 |
5.41 |
45.81 |
4.62 |
4.49 |
4.09 |
5.28 |
4.88 |
|
BGA 169_ 4 |
5.81 |
6.73 |
6.73 |
5.41 |
130.96 |
3.17 |
43.57 |
5.81 |
4.62 |
5.41 |
|
BGA 169_3 |
5.81 |
6.60 |
6.60 |
5.68 |
78.95 |
4.09 |
25.08 |
4.49 |
4.22 |
6.07 |
|
BGA 169_2 |
4.75 |
6.60 |
6.60 |
5.28 |
76.57 |
3.83 |
23.50 |
4.89 |
5.15 |
6.07 |
|
BGA196_1 |
5.54 |
5.94 |
5.94 |
4.49 |
85.81 |
4.62 |
28.65 |
4.62 |
4.49 |
5.28 |

Figure 3. Board 1070-003 (SN100C) after vibration testing.

Thermal Shock Testing
Thermal Shock testing was performed by Boeing Phantom Works
for the JG-PP project. The exposure profile for the joints
were 1000 cycles of -55° to 125°C with dwells of 15
minutes (see below).

Results showed only 3 failures with the PDIP’s, two
SnPb and one SnAgCu. No manufactured SN100C PDIP’s failed
at 1000 cycles.
SN100C has been patented by Nihon Superior and is offered
worldwide through licensed manufacturers including FCT Solder
for North America. We offer SN100C for wave solder and lead
tinning, reflow solder paste applications, and SN100CL for
lead free hot air solder leveling (HASL) of P.C. Boards.
We will be including in future newsletters, many of the advantages
our current customers have discovered in switching to SN100C
as their lead free alloy of choice and we welcome your comments
and questions. We look forward to working with you to make
your transition to lead free as successful as possible. |